Leadership

Mindset of the Agile Coach as…

Mindset of the Agile Coach as…

Self-Mastery is the hub of the Agile Coaching Growth Wheel. As such, it serves as a central connection to all of the competencies with the Wheel. In other words, each competency has self-mastery as a foundational layer when operating within that competency. 

That being said, when I think of Self-Mastery within the context of the ACGW, I also think about the unique mindset that each competency requires. It’s not one mindset across all competencies but unique aspects that emerge for each competency.

Below, I wanted to explore what I think of as essential mindset aspects for each of the primary coaching competencies—

Self-Mastery

  • Checking ego lessness

  • Checking coachability

  • Checking self-awareness

  • Checking community engagement

  • Checking self-care

  • Checking your continuous growth

  • Showing Up – Realizing that every other stance is grounded by YOU.

Agile Coaches - Becoming a Trusted Advisor

Agile Coaches - Becoming a Trusted Advisor

As I think about the Agile Coaching Growth Wheel Advising (consulting, consultative) stance, I don’t think it’s initially something you automatically do as an agile coach. Instead, I think it’s something you are either invited to do or become over time.

That aspect makes it quite different than some of the other stances. For example, Coaching, Facilitation, or Guiding Learning includes the invitation and empowerment with the role.

I also think the Advising stance aligns with the Leader stance; in that, you must be more intentional in becoming an Advisor—

  • It’s something you step into and earn over time.

  • It has more risk associated with it than the other stances, thus requiring more courage and resilience.

  • And finally, it places more pressure on your Self-mastery and Leader stances.

This may be why many coaches struggle so much with the stance. Not only from a skills perspective, but many seem afraid of it—so they find excuses to avoid operating as an advisor. And they’re not necessarily wrong. 

To help empower more coaches to become comfortable with advising, I thought I’d share some ideas around elements supporting their evolution.

Measuring your Impact & Value as a Leadership-level Agile Coach

Measuring your Impact & Value as a Leadership-level Agile Coach

I recently shared a piece entitled Measuring Leadership Coaches and Their Impact. The perspective in the article was primarily mine. What did I look for in leadership coaches (agile coaches) when they coached me in agile contexts?  

There were a few questions in the LinkedIn responses where folks sought specific metrics. I’m guessing outcome-based, results-based, specific measures I used to evaluate my coaches. The reality was I didn’t have those. Truthfully, I didn’t care about them. I cared about how the coach connected to me as a human and leader rather than some arbitrary metric that I applied to the coach. And to me, any metric was a “system metric” in that it applied to the coach + me and how we impacted the system…together.

I feel like this answer will disappoint those looking to create a leadership coaching metrics dashboard, but so be it.

All that being said, I was inspired to share these indicators of a leadership coach’s performance. They augment what I was trying to say in the first article, and I hope you find them more helpful in guiding you toward measuring your systemic value.

Measuring Leadership Coaches and their Impact

Measuring Leadership Coaches and their Impact

Today, there’s a tremendous amount of discussion on measuring the impact of agile coaches and their coaching effectively. 

The coaches referred to in this discussion would include—

  • Leadership coaches

  • Organizational coaches

  • Change Management coaches

  • And, most importantly for this discussion, Enterprise-level Agile coaches

These are people who often coach up to leadership and across the organization. It’s a different sort of coaching that requires different skills, competencies, and experience than other forms of coaching (Scrum Masters, Team-level, RTE, etc.) in agile contexts.

While often the organization and coaches try to tie success downward at the team level towards execution performance and delivery impact, I believe these are red herring measures for these sorts of coaches.

So, the critical question becomes, how should we measure the effectiveness of this sort of coach?

I’m glad you asked!

Two More Leadership Ideas

Two More Leadership Ideas

Trauma-Informed Leadership

Kima Tozay recently wrote an article entitled 6 Reasons to Practice Trauma Informed Leadership in Your Workplace.

Here are three snippets from the article—

What is trauma-informed leadership?

According to David Tweedy, a Clinical Psychologist and Healthcare Executive, “Trauma-informed Leadership is a way of understating or appreciating there is an emotional world of experiences rumbling around beneath the surface.” He affirms that “when emotional responses are triggered in the workplace, each person responds according to the extent of their emotional scars, traumas and emotional strengths.”…

Two Leadership Ideas

Two Leadership Ideas

Congruence

Heidi Araya recently published an article entitled Dear Executive: Incongruence Comes with a Cost.

Here are two snippets from the beginning of the article—

Another example of incongruence would be that management tells teams to work in a specific way (“agile” for example), but do not model this themselves. For example, teams must be transparent and report their metrics upwards, but leadership is not transparent with their decisions or metrics. A common one is managers saying they want people to “work more as a team,” but promoting individual metrics for productivity instead or assigning individuals to projects. 

-----

The Six Types of Courage

The Six Types of Courage

I’ve long been curious about courage. My most recent connection is to it being one of the 5 Scrum Values and, when asked, it always emerges as my favorite value.

Why? Part of me doesn’t really know why.

I am a big fan of the Wizard of Oz and the Cowardly Lion role. Always smiling when he—finds the Courage that was essentially always inside of him.

Another aspect is that I think it takes a great deal of courage to show up as an agile leader, agile coach, or other change agents in agile transformations. It certainly isn’t for the timid or faint of heart!

So, imagine my delight when I found the reference on Lion’s Whiskers to their 6 Types of Courage and the thinking around it. It expanded the nuance and depth of understanding around the term. So much so, that I’d thought I’d share it with you.

Although many times we see a blend of two or more of these types of courage, there is generally one that dominates the occasion.

Here are the six types of courage:

An Agile Seat at the Table

An Agile Seat at the Table

There are two aspects I’m noodling on in this article—

  1. Having a Seat at the Table, versus…

  2. Having a real Seat at the Table.

Then,

  1. Being empowered and supported to effect change, versus…

  2. Having real empowerment and support to effect change.

In an agile transformation to an agile mindset and agile ways of working. You might be asking—what’s the difference? Well, I’ll share some stories to explain, but before that, I should explain the role context here? Who am I referring to? Well, it could be anyone tasked with guiding an organizational agile transformation. For example:

  • An Agile change agent;

  • A Director of Agile Transformation;

  • An Enterprise-level Agile Coach;

  • An Agile PMO Director or Leader;

  • Or the Agile Steering Group.

Should be considering the following recommendations.

Measuring the Effectiveness of Agile Coaching and Coaches

Measuring the Effectiveness of Agile Coaching and Coaches

I’m just now finishing up my agile coaching book and I’ve been thinking about aspects that I may not have adequately covered in it. Measuring agile coaches/coaching and the impact rose to the top of my mind. And as I considered my writing history in this space, it dawned on me that I had never tackled it directly and I began to wonder why?

I think it’s because I don’t like or agree or resonate with the idea of discretely measuring agile coach or coaching performance. Why? No, it’s not because I’m afraid to be measured or held accountable in some way. Mostly, it’s because I don’t think it’s relevant.

The very nature of agile coaching is helping others to experiment, to learn and adapt, to change, and to improve their results. It’s not about measuring the coach. It’s about the performance of who they are coaching that truly counts. That is measuring the individuals, leaders, teams, or organizations that are being coached.

For example, if I’m coaching a Product Team (Chief Product Owner, Product Managers, and Product Owners) in an agile instance do they…

  • Improve the ROI driven across products?

  • Connect more to their clients? Envisioning better?

  • Work more cohesively as a team and are better aligned (horizontally & vertically) across other functions?

  • Are they learning more effectively as a community of practice?

  • Are the leaders operating more as Catalyst leaders? (See Bill Joiner’s work on Leadership Agility)

If these and many other measures are trending positively and improving, then I might be a strong part of that improvement. But while I, as the coach, am part of the system, it’s the system that improves and it’s the system that should be measured.

But I do have a few thoughts on effective measures of the coach that might be separate from the outcomes they are contributing (or not contributing) to.

Common (Agile) Leadership Traps

Common (Agile) Leadership Traps

If you are a leader in agile organizational contexts…

And you score high (meaning they resonate with your behavior) on the following anti-patterns…

You just might want take some time for personal reflection, or inquire about some personal coaching, or simply pivot to another job ;-)

1. You are double and triple booked on your calendars every day, and it’s somewhat of a badge of honor.

a. This often appears to be ego-driven or power-driven.

b. It can also be driven by FOMO.

2. You’re often running from meeting to meeting, to meeting with no time in between; late for one, distracted, and leaving early.